More Than Genes and Cells: Drug Discovery in the Extracellular Matrix (ECM)

More Than Genes and Cells: Drug Discovery in the Extracellular Matrix (ECM)

By Dr William Bains

Drug discovery in the last few decades has focused on the cellular and genetic mechanisms of disease. This has been very successful in cancer, which is a disease of somatic genetics, and moderately successful elsewhere.

But the declining productivity of pharmaceutical and biotechnology investment in drug discovery and development suggests that we should be alert to other approaches. One is to look outside the cell, at the extracellular superstructure of the body.

Once viewed as an inert structure that is just the biological equivalent of a petri dish, the extracellular milieu is now being seen as a therapeutic target, especially for diseases of old age. Importantly, targeting the scaffold of the body might be a much faster route to treatment for some conditions than attempting to find, and fix, underlying cellular or genetic aetiology of disease.

It is a truism that we become less flexible as we age. This is literally true of many tissues, which become more mechanically rigid and less amenable to tissue remodelling with age. Loss of flexibility is due at least in part to chemical changes in the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) in the tissue, converting a flexible network of molecules into a rigid mesh.

Stiffness increases have been recorded in lung, major arteries, bone, muscle, tendon and lens of the eye among other tissues in older compared to younger people. However, this remodelling with age is more important to disability and disease than just piling on the wrinkles or reducing our score in tennis. In a range of contexts it has been linked to disease, and research in the last decade has suggested how targeting ECM proteins could be blocked or reversed to open a new route to treat those diseases.

The ECM makes up around one-third of our bodies by dry mass. It is a complex meshwork of proteins, proteoglycans and other molecules constructed on a scaffold of collagen. There are two broad types of ECM: basement membrane and interstitial ECM. The basement membrane directly underlies endothelial and epithelial cells, and is composed of primarily of type IV collagen, laminins, entactin, nidogen and heparan sulfate proteoglycans such as perlecan.

The interstitial ECM, which makes up most of the extracellular mass of the body, consists of many different types of collagen, tenascin, proteoglycans and elastin in elastic tissues such as skin or tendon. The ECM can also bind a variety of soluble proteins such as cytokines and growth factors (2).

Chemical cross-linking of the proteins in the ECM is central to its construction: human mutations or mouse knock-outs of cross-linking enzymes are usually severely disabling or lethal. During growth and development the principal cross-linking chemistry is catalysed by Lysyl Oxidase (LO), a family of at least four enzymes in man that oxidise lysine to an aldehyde which can then react with other nitrogen-containing amino acid side-chains to form cross-links that are very stable under physiological conditions. The amount and chemical sites of LO-derived cross-links vary substantially between tissues and depend, at least in part, on the proteins being cross-linked.

Collagen is the most widespread LO substrate. There are at least 27 different collagen types, arranged in many different architectures (3). Different collagens are cross-linked to different degrees; for example, collagen III is present in bone fibrils but not detectable in extracts, probably because high levels of cross-linking render it completely insoluble (4). LO also links elastin into the ECM, although it forms different crosslinks between elastin chains.

LO is not only essential for the construction of ECM during growth and development, but also during wound healing. After mechanical damage or inflammation new ECM is laid down and crosslinked with LO family members and transglutaminases (discussed below).

With chronic damage, especially chronic inflammation, this wound healing response becomes dysregulated and excessive masses of poorly organised ECM are laid down, resulting in fibrosis. Many fibrotic conditions are associated with increase in collagen cross-linking density as well as increase in collagen mass (5). Changed mechanical tension in the ECM itself in such fibrotic tissue enhances fibroblast’s secretion of inflammatory cytokines, driving further inflammation and fibrosis.

Collagen is turned over very slowly: some measures of ECM turnover in tendons and bone suggest protein half-lives of years to decades in man. Partly for this reason, fibrosis has primarily been seen as a pathology of excess ECM production, and especially production of collagen fibres that are poorly ordered compared to healthy tissue, because once in place the collagen is seen as ‘there for life’.

However, cross-linking is key to this, both because it locks collagen into disordered networks and because it renders it harder to turn over and remodel into healthier material. Thus LO inhibitors are being seen as an important therapeutic approach to a wide range of fibrotic disease. In particular, Barry-Hamilton et al (6) recently showed that inhibiting Lysyl Oxidase homologue LOXL2 with an enzyme-specific monoclonal antibody reduces fibrosis and cross-linking in mice with liver fibrosis induced with carbon tetrachloride.

Although the inflammation was no less severe in the treated mice, they lived longer than control animals. By targeting the fibrotic damage effectively, this approach modifies disease without delving into the complexities either of inflammation or of hepatic metabolism.

The body does turn over collagen through wholesale degradation of the ECM, probably by metalloproteases and subsequent excretion of cross-links. An ideal treatment for chronic fibrotic disease might therefore be to supplement this turnover with therapeutic enzymes that break just the cross-links, allowing less radical remodelling of fibrotic tissue in situ.

This would be a specific example of an approach termed ‘Medical Bioremediation’ (7) (by analogy with environmental bioremediation) more usually discussed in terms of clearing accumulated intracellular material using exogenously supplied enzymes.

Applying such an approach to fibrotic disease is precedented with the approval of injectable Clostridium collagenase as a treatment for Dupuytren’s Contracture (8), and is being pursued at a preclinical level as a therapy for macular degeneration and atherosclerosis among other diseases. However, no suitable enzyme for cross-link clearance is known, and targeting would have to be quite specific to avoid large-scale unlinking of ECM collagen.

While LO is a major cross-link of collagen, a second class of enzyme cross-links a wider variety of ECM proteins during development, inflammation and wound-healing. Transglutaminases (TGs) are a group of enzymes that catalyse the formation of an isopeptide bond between the side-chains of glutamine and lysine residues (Figure 1B).

Figure 1 Cross links and their chemistries. Lysyl Oxidase, Transglutaminase, and Glycation

Unlike LOs, TGs have been widely discussed as a drug target. In particular, the ubiquitously expressed TG2 has been researched as a drug target for fibrosis and for cancer (9).

TG2 is a multifunctional protein; as well as its transglutaminase activity, it is active as a G protein to GPCRs, a GTPase, a disulfide isomerase, a protein kinase and it binds directly to fibronectin and integrin, thus mediating cell:ECM interactions. It is found in the cell nucleus, cytoplasm and plasma membrane as well as in the ECM, has at least two spice variants, is modulated by Ca2+, NO, GTP and redox state, and has several roles in inflammation and apoptosis as well as ECM structural modification (10).

Its biology is therefore complex, but its transglutamination role can be well elucidated by looking at the levels of the cross-link it forms (EGGL – see Figure 1B) in the ECM. Alas, this is rarely done, as protein and mRNA levels are easier to measure, so those are what most research examines.

Like LO, TG2 is relatively promiscuous in its substrate, acting on amino acids on the surface of proteins that are in inherently disordered regions of structure and which approach near enough in the ECM to be cross-linked. Unlike LO, knocking out TG2 in mice results in animals that are nearly normal, a bizarre result for a multifunctional, ubiquitously expressed enzyme. It is likely that other enzymes, especially blood clotting factor XIIIa (which is also a transglutaminase) can replace TG2’s function in some roles in development.

TG2’s transglutaminase activity is seen in inflammatory disease, and especially fibrotic disease, so this may be another target for fibrosis. There has been a lot of work on inhibitors of TG2, primarily aimed at its role in cancer biology (11). Small molecule TG2 inhibitors reduce fibrotic scarring in rodent models of diabetic nephropathy, and a TG2 knock-out mouse has reduced fibrosis in a lung fibrosis model (12). However, these have not yet had quite as dramatic a therapeutic effect as the LO inhibitor described above.

As with LO cross-links, it would be useful not just to block the formation of EGGL in the ECM but to clear EGGL embedded in long-lived proteins such as tendon and bone collagen. Here we have more reason to be optimistic, because enzymes that cleave the EGGL isopeptide bond specifically are known, for example from leeches (13) and the brown moth (14). The technical barrier to getting even a preclinical candidate therapeutic will be to find an enzyme with minimum activity against the peptide bonds in proteins, and hence with an acceptable safety profile.

There are many other chemical changes in the ECM with disease and age, but the last we will consider here is glycation. Glycation is an entirely spontaneous and non-enzymatic chemical change to proteins (as opposed to glycosylation, which is a different, enzyme-controlled process). Reducing sugars react spontaneously with amines to form Schiffs bases, which can rearrange to Amadori products.

The Schiff’s bases are readily hydrolysed back to the free amines and sugars, but the Amadori products are relatively stable and can undergo further, complex oxidative chemistry to form a complex soup of compounds collectively called Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGEs) (Figure 1C).

AGEs are stable under physiological conditions, and so accumulate in long-lived proteins. Some are fluorescent, and so tissue fluorescence is sometimes used as a measure of AGEs. The most common AGEs are CML and CEL, and many studies examine these (they are the immunodominant target of the few commercial anti-AGE antibodies that show any specificity for an AGE). However, recent research shows that other, non-fluorescent AGEs are more physiologically important, and particularly the cross-link glucosepane (15).

Glucosepane is strongly correlated with diabetic complications in man (16), and has been linked to degradation of the mechanical properties of skin, lung, bone and the arterial wall (17). The main focus of research in glycation has been the arterial wall, where AGE cross-links have been specifically associated with hypertension (18).

It is believed that this is because AGE cross-links between all the molecules in the elastic ECM of the arterial wall reduce its ability to expand and contract as the systolic pressure wave passes, thus increasing the systolic pressure peak, although other mechanisms are possible. AGEs are also correlated with nephrosis in diabetics. Major causes of morbidity in diabetes are hypertension, kidney damage and associated circulatory damage that leads to ulcers and retinopathy, so AGEs are a good potential target for these diseases.

Alas, AGE formation is purely chemical, and so cannot be blocked by an enzyme inhibitor or a mouse knock-out. AGE formation could be blocked by agents that trap the -dicarbonyl intermediates on the path to AGE. Aminoguanidine and pyridoxamine have been tested as AGE blockers (19).

Results have not been that impressive in man, however, possibly in part because you have to take the compounds continuously for 10 years to block the accumulation of AGEs in a protein with a 10-year half-life. It is likely that one of the benefits of calorie restriction (among many others) is reduced blood sugar levels and hence reduced glycation, but this is an even harder regime to adhere to.

A better route would be to clear glucosepane from the body, but here again we are stymied for lack of an enzyme or, until very recently, even a good supply of authentic glucosepane to test enzymes on. However one compound – Alagebrium (ALT711 – see Figure 2) – has been developed as a chemical AGE-breaker.

Figure 2 AGE-breaker chemistry. Structure of compounds ALT711, TRC4186

It was designed to be a reagent that catalytically breaks – dicarbonyls, which (at the time) were seen as a major form of cross-link in vivo (20). Early trials showed a beneficial effect in man, but a larger follow- up trial showed no benefit (20-22). There is also controversy over the drug’s mode of action.

Recent research has confirmed that Alagebrium does catalytically cleave dicarbonyls (23), resolving doubt about this in the past, but it is now believed that dicarbonyls are quantitatively trivial compared to the chemically stable AGE cross-links (16). So the trials of Alagebrium have generated a drug that does something in rats (24), may do something in man, but it is as yet not clear what or how.

Torrent Pharmaceuticals is taking the compound TRC4186 into clinical trials as an AGE-breaker. Its chemical mode of action is obscure; the compound was identified by randomly reacting highly AGEd serum albumin (made by incubating BSA with 1.67M glucose for 16 weeks) with collagen, a chemistry that bears little relationship to AGE cross-links in vivo, and then searching for compounds that released the BSA. TRC4186 appears beneficial in animal hypertension models (25) but no human efficacy data has been released (26).

In the absence of reliable chemical or enzymatic methods of cleaving glucosepane, a supply of pure material to screen, any reliable highthroughput assay methods, and no realistic prospect for stopping its formation, AGE-breaker strategies remain speculative at the moment. Development of technology in any of these areas could open AGE-breaking to be a third approach to ECM cross-link clearance.

Other AGEs accumulate in tissues, but are probably of less physiological importance. The crosslink pentosidine has been the subject of much research because it is easy to detect, but is a minor component compared to glucosepane. Monovalent AGEs such as CML and CEL are also probably of little physiological importance unless they happen to modify a key functional residue, but the MGH AGEs are being seen as physiologically important (27), and may also be a target for future AGEclearing strategies.

I have focused on fibrotic and inflammatory diseases above because they provide the most obvious conventional target for ECM-targeting therapies. But there is substantial evidence that repairing the ECM could be a valuable approach to cancer therapeutics and will be a central plank of future regenerative medicine treatments. The ECM environment modulates cancer cell growth and migration (28).

Cells sense mechanical tension as well as chemical environment and respond to changes in the mechanical structure of the ECM: many cancers modulate the ECM around themselves to form a more permissive environment for their own growth. Barry-Hamilton et al6 showed elevated LOXL2 in some tumours, and that blocking LOXL2 reduced tumour growth in mouse Xenograft models. The role of TG2 in cancer is well known (29).

ECM-targeting strategies have generally not been high on the list of preferred anti-cancer strategies because they can only slow cancer growth, not kill the cells. However, they work through fundamentally different mechanisms from more mainstream approaches, ones unrelated to intracellular mechanics of cell growth or apoptosis, and so may provide valuable adjuncts to other therapies.

A more exciting application of ECM-modulating therapeutics is in Regenerative Medicine. Regenerative Medicine seeks to repair disease- or age-related damage through one of two broad strategies: stimulating endogenous repair mechanisms that have been damaged or down-regulated, or providing exogenous cells or tissues.

It is now well-known that cells grown in tissue culture mimic in vivo cell behaviour better if the cells are grown in a 3D matrix mimicking the ECM, rather than on flat glass or plastic surfaces, and that, far from being inert, many components of the ECM have powerful signalling effects on cells (2). Even cell growth that is dependent on growth factors such as TGF- is in fact also dependent on the mechanical properties of the ECM in vivo, because TGF- is stored in the ECM as bound complexes, and released by cell-specific proteases or mechanical tension (30).

It is now understood that the quality of the ECM in vivo can also be decisive in determining how well cells function to repair tissue after damage. Several studies have suggested that the failure of older tissue to repair itself as well as young tissue is due at least as much to the ‘old’ ECM as to the cells themselves being old. For example, the replicative and differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells from old mice could be ‘rescued’ by growing them on ECM generated by young stem cells (31).

Kang and Lightman tracked regenerating peripheral nerves in the mouse and showed that the poorer regeneration in old mice over young ones was due to the lack of ability of the growing axon tips to clear debris from damaged nerves from their path. In the absence of debris, they grew and innervated muscle as well as nerves from young animals (32).

Loss of functional fibroblasts in the dermis of the skin, and hence loss of skin strength, elasticity and thickness with ‘normal’ ageing is primarily driven by degradation of the collagen matrix to which the cells attach, including glycation (33). Thus ECM repair is likely to be a key component of either of the regenerative medicine strategies (34).

The structural proteins of the body, especially collagen, have traditionally been viewed as nonstarters as drug discovery targets, because they are not obviously active as catalysts or signal transduction molecules. The recent work summarised above shows that this is not necessarily a good argument for ignoring the ECM.

As an alternative route to identifying the role of every gene in every cell in a complex disease such as chronic inflammation or in cancer, targeting damage to the ECM may prove a valuable approach to new treatments for a range of diseases and disabilities of old age. DDW

This article originally featured in the DDW Winter 2013 Issue

Dr William Bains is an academic, scientist and entrepreneur. After an academic career in the UK and the USA, William worked in technical consultancy and venture capital before founding his first start-up in 1998. He teaches company creation and financing at Cambridge and Warwick Universities, and is author of more than 90 research papers on subjects as diverse as drug chemistry, company law and extraterrestrial life, and four books. He is currently a Staff Scientist at MIT, Senior Research Associate and Programme Manager of the SRF laboratory at Cambridge University, and wants to get rid of his wrinkles!

Scannell, JW et al. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2012. 11(3): p. 191 – 200.

2 Karsdal, MA et al. Extracellular Matrix Remodeling: The Common Denominator in Connective Tissue Diseases. Assay and Drug Development Technologies, 2013. 11(2): p. 70 – 92.

3 Birk, DE and Bruckner, P. Collagen superstructures. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2005. 247: p. 185 – 205.

4 Eyre, DR and Wu, J-J. Collagen cross-links. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2005. 247: p. 207 – 229.

5 van der Slot, AJ et al. Increased formation of pyridinoline cross-links due to higher telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase levels is a general fibrotic phenomenon. Matrix Biology, 2004. 23: p. 251 – 257.

6 Barry-Hamilton, V et al. Allosteric inhibition of lysyl oxidase-like-2 impedes the development of a pathologic microenvironment. Nat Med, 2010. 16(9): p. 1009-1017.

7 De Grey, ADNJ et al. Medical bioremediation: Prospects for the application of microbial catabolic diversity to aging and several major age-related diseases. Ageing Research Reviews, 2005. 4: p. 315 – 338.

8 Hurst, LC et al. Injectable Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum for Dupuytren’s Contracture. New England Journal of Medicine, 2009. 361(10): p. 968-979.

9 Bains, W. Transglutaminse 2 and EGGL, the Protein Cross- Link Formed by Transglutaminse 2, As Therapeutic Targets for Disabilities of Old Age. Rejuvenation Research, 2013. 16(6): p. 495 – 517.

10 Fesus, L and Piacentini, M. Transglutaminase 2: an enigmatic enzyme with diverse functions. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2002. 27(10): p. 534-539.

11 Badarau, E, Collighan, RJ, and Griffin, M. Recent advances in the development of tissue transglutaminase (TG2) inhibitors. Amino Acids, 2011. DOI 10.1007/s00726- 011-1188-4.

12 Iismaa, SE et al., Transglutaminases and disease: lessons from genetically engineered mouse models and inherited disorders. Physiol. Rev., 2009. 89: p. 991 – 1023.

13 Friedrich, T et al. An isopeptide bond splitting enzyme from Hirudo medicinalis similar to -glutamyl transpeptidase. European Journal of Biochemistry, 1998. 256(2): p. 297-302.

14 Simpson, RM and Christeller, JT. Identification of isopeptidase activity in the midgut of insects: Purification, properties and nutritional ecology of a Hofmannophila pseudospretella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) larval enzyme. Insect Science, 2010. 17(4): p. 325-334.

15 Sell, DR et al. Glucosepane is a major protein cross-link of the senescent human extracellular matrix. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2005. 280(13): p. 12310 – 12316.

16 Fan, X et al. Anaerobic vs aerobic pathways of carbonyl and oxidant stress in human lens and skin during aging and in diabetes: A comparative analysis. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2010. 49: p. 847 – 856.

17 Sjoberg, JS and Bulterijs, S. Characteristics, Formation, and Pathophysiology of Glucosepane: A Major Protein Cross-Link. Rejuvenation Research, 2009. 12(2): p. 137 – 148.

18 Sell, DR and Monnier, VM. Molecular Basis of Arterial Stiffening: Role of Glycation – A Mini-Review. Gerontology, 2012. 58(3): p. 227-237.

19 Nobécourt, E et al. Effects of cross-link breakers, glycation inhibitors and insulin sensitisers on HDL function and the nonenzymatic glycation of apolipoprotein A-I. Diabetologia, 2008. 51: p. 1008 – 1017.

20 Bakris, GL et al. Advanced glycation end-product crosslink breakers. A novel approach to cardiovascular pathologies related to the ageing process. AM. J. Hypertension, 2004. 17(12): p. 23S – 30S.

21 Hartog, JWL et al. Effects of alagebrium, an advanced glycation end product breaker, on exercise tolerance and cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure, 2011. 13: p. 899 – 908.

22 Little, WC et al. The Effect of Alagebrium Chloride (ALT- 711), a Novel Glucose Cross- Link Breaker, in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2005. 11(3): p. 191-195.

23 Kim, T and Spiegel, DA. The Unique Reactivity of NPhenacyl- Derived Thiazolium Salts Toward -Dicarbonyl Compounds. Rejuvenation Research, 2013. 16(1): p. 43 – 50.

24 Forbes, JM et al. The breakdown of pre-existing advanced glycation end products is associated with reduced renal fibrosis in experimental diabetes. The FASEB Journal, 2003. 17(12): p. 1762-1764.

25 Pathak, P et al. TRC4149, a novel Advanced Glycation End Product breaker improves hemodynamic status in diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats. Eur. J. Med. Res, 2008. 13: p. 388 – 398.

26 Chandra, KP et al. Phase I Clinical Studies of the Advanced Glycation Endproduct (AGE)-Breaker TRC4186. Clinical Drug Invest, 2009. 29(9): p. 559 – 575.

27 Wang, T, Kartika, R and Spiegel, DA. Exploring Posttranslational Arginine Modification Using Chemically Synthesized Methylglyoxal Hydroimidazolones. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. 134(21): p. 8958-8967.

28 Butcher, DT, Alliston, T and Weaver, VM. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer, 2009. 9(2): p. 108 – 122.

29 Lentini, A et al. Transglutaminases: key regulators of cancer metastasis. Amino Acids, 2013. 44(1): p. 25-32.

30 Tenney, RM and Discher, DE. Stem cells, microenvironment mechanics, and growth factor activation. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2009. 21: p. 630 – 635.

31 Sun, Y et al. Rescuing replication and osteogenesis of aged mesenchymal stem cells by exposure to a young extracellular matrix. FASEB Journal, 2008. 25: p. 1474 – 1485.

32 Kang, H and Lichtman, JW. Motor Axon Regeneration and Muscle Reinnervation in Young Adult and Aged Animals. Journal of Neuroscience, 2013. 33(50): p. 19480 – 19491.

33 Fisher, GJ, Varani, J and Voorhees, JJ. Looking older: fibroblast collapse and therapeutic implications. Archives of Dermatology, 2008. 144(5): p. 666 – 672.

34 Kurtz, A and Oh, S-J. Age related changes of the extracellular matrix and stem cell maintenance. Preventive Medicine, 2012. 54, Supplement(0): p. S50-S56.

Related Articles

Join FREE today and become a member
of Drug Discovery World

Membership includes:

  • Full access to the website including free and gated premium content in news, articles, business, regulatory, cancer research, intelligence and more.
  • Unlimited App access: current and archived digital issues of DDW magazine with search functionality, special in App only content and links to the latest industry news and information.
  • Weekly e-newsletter, a round-up of the most interesting and pertinent industry news and developments.
  • Whitepapers, eBooks and information from trusted third parties.
Join For Free