New developments in antigen-specific immunotherapies Novel therapeutic vaccines offer hope in the fight against chronic infectious disease and cancer. Spring 2003
An improved understanding of the immune system has led to the development of a number of novel treatment approaches for cancer and chronic infectious diseases. These approaches are aimed at inducing or boosting immune effector mechanisms that control or contain tumours and persistent pathogens. There are two major categories of the human adaptive immune response; the most broadly recognised is antibodymediated immunity, also called humoral immunity. Antibodies are carried in body fluids such as blood or lymph and tackle pathogens found outside the body’s cells.
However, intracellular pathogens such as all viruses, some parasites and some bacteria are able to avoid exposure to antibodies. Antibodies cannot destroy an infected cell. Similarly, antibodies are not effective at killing tumour cells. Faced with these situations, the body employs cell-mediated immunity to identify and destroy diseased cells.
Cells of the immune system constantly monitor for the presence of malignant or pathogen-infected cells within the body (Figure 1). In the case of chronic virus infection or tumour development the patient’s immune system has failed to contain the virus or appearance of malignancies. Therapeutic vaccination is based on the concept that the immune system can be effectively stimulated in the presence of such conditions. There are several naturally occurring chronic virus infections caused by pathogens such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) which, following an initial acute infection, are properly controlled in the majority of immunocompetent individuals. Observations in cancer patients, particularly melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, suggest that strong cellular immune responses can lead to tumour regression1. Studies of these diseases revealed the presence of disease antigen specific immune cells called CD8+ cytotoxic T cells that evolved to deal with the intracellular pathogens or tumours. In contrast to disease antigen specific antibodies, CD8+ T cells exert numerous effector functions targeting the antigen expressing cells. In vivo, antigen specific CD8+ T cells can actively reach the site of virus infection or infiltrate tumours rather than passive diffusion of antibody molecules. Antigen expressing target cells are then eliminated by CD8+ T cells through secretion of anti-viral and tumoricidal factors. In addition, in viral infections the localised release of cytokines can prevent virus replication in neighbouring cells, therefore preventing further spread. Many current strategies in therapeutic vaccination aim to induce or increase antigen-specific CD8+ T cells.
Antigen delivery platform technologies for therapeutic vaccination
Historically it has been difficult to reliably induce and monitor CD8+ T cell responses in humans. Traditional antigen delivery technologies such as inactivated pathogens or subunit protein vaccines are potent at inducing antibody responses but fail to elicit significant levels of CD8+ T cells. Therefore a number of clinical trials testing protein-based products as therapeutic vaccines inducing CD8+ T cells were disappointing2. Different antigen delivery technologies are being developed aimed at introducing the antigen into antigen presenting cells which in turn stimulate CD8+ T cells. Recombinant protein-based approaches now use improved adjuvants, or use dendritic cells to deliver antigens. Nearly all human cells present antigens to the immune system in a non-professional fashion, ie in addition to their defined function. However, certain cells of the immune system, such as dendritic cells, present antigens via a different mechanism that results in potent immune stimulation – these cells are described as professional antigen presenting cells or APCs. Gene-based antigen delivery systems introduce the antigen into both professional and non-professional antigen presenting cells. This method has predominantly used recombinant viruses and DNA vaccines as antigen delivery systems. Initial success in small animal models raised high hopes for the potency of these antigen delivery systems since both antibody and cellular responses were observed3. However, assessment of this technology in non-human primates and humans revealed that these antigen delivery systems are far less immunogenic than predicted from small animal studies. Currently several new approches are being tested in clinical trials in order to increase the immunogenicity of gene-based antigen delivery systems4. Simply presenting the immune system with the same antigen in the same context (repeated administration) or larger amounts might not be sufficient to induce strong immune responses. The sequential administration of the same antigen in different (heterologous) antigen delivery systems has proved to be particular effective for the induction of high levels of CD8+ T cell responses in rodents and non-human primates5,6. This powerful heterologous prime-boost approach is now being tested in clinical trials for a number of different diseases such as HIV and malaria in a preventive setting, and for chronic hepatitis B infection, HIV and melanoma in a therapeutic setting.
The heterologous prime-boost regimen exploits the ability of the immune system to generate large numbers of secondary antigen specific T cells following the initial priming step. The same antigen is delivered in sequence using different vectors. Following a priming immunisation, the antigen specific T cell population expands to modest levels and then contracts. Over time a proportion of these cells transform into memory T cells. This results in an increased number of antigen-specific memory T cells. Memory T cells have the ability to expand rapidly upon encounter with the same antigen a second time round. In an heterologous boost situation, because the priming and boosting vectors are different, T cells specifically targeting the viral vector are not boosted and do not activate cell number control mechanisms, therefore allowing for greater expansion of the disease antigen-specific T cell populations (Figure 2)6.
Several groups have now established that heterologous prime-boost regimens are among the most potent strategies to induce strong cellular immune responses. For example, a primary response can be induced by plasmid DNA vaccines. Boosting of this primary response with a heterologous (viral) vector will result in 4-10 fold higher T cell responses compared to homologous boosts with the same DNA vaccine7-9. It is speculated that the cytokine microenvironment created by a local virus infection during boosting is responsible for the effective expansion of effector T cells. Viral vectors such as vaccinia virus or adenovirus proved to be particularly effective at boosting immune responses10,11.
The superiority of heterologous prime-boost immunisation regimen has been confirmed in many pre-clinical models including small rodents, ruminants and non-human primates. In humans, heterologous prime-boost immunisation regimen are currently being tested for cancer (melanoma, colon carcinoma, prostate carcinoma) and infectious diseases (chronic hepatitis B infection, HIV, malaria and tuberculosis).
Target diseases for therapeutic vaccines
Chronic infectious disease: HIV
Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus results in the initial rapid replication of the virus until initial immune effector mechanisms are activated. This acute phase of primary HIV infection is often associated with flu-like symtoms. Once high levels of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells are generated the virus load decreases and initially the virus is controlled but not eliminated. Eventually after 3- 20 years of persistent virus infection the control by CD8+ T cells fails and AIDS develops. The reasons why HIV eventually evades control by the immune system remain unclear. Other persistent virus infections such as EBV and CMV seem to be controlled by the immune system for life. Probable reasons include the gradual decline of CD4+ (helper) T cell numbers and function (HIV invades and infects this important subset of immune cells), damage to antigen presenting cells and repeated escape from the CD8+ T cells by mutation in the virus.
The role of HIV-specific T cells in HIV infection is being exploited for preventive and therapeutic HIV vaccines. In the preventive setting the induction of HIV specific effector T cells provides a build-up defence to combat incoming viruses. Studies in a small minority of commercial sex workers with high frequencies of virus exposures who remain uninfected yielded the first clues on the role of CD8+ T cells in HIV immunity. These individuals have high levels of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells and no detectable antibody responses to HIV12. Studies in monkeys have also shown that vaccination to stimulate CD8+ T cells can protect against challenge with SIV, the simian equivalent of HIV. Therapeutic HIV vaccines aim at boosting numbers or changing the quality of CD8+ T cells in chronically infected individuals. Given that natural infection stimulates a very good response in the early stages, it is unlikely that vaccination alone will do much good. A more promising idea is to combine vaccination with drug treatment. The new antiretroviral drugs can reduce virus levels in HIV infected people to undetectable levels, but they do not eliminate virus and if treatment is stopped virus rebounds within weeks. When virus levels are reduced by drugs the CD8+ T cell response falls because of reduced antigen stimulation13. Therapeutic vaccination could restore this T cell response, so that if drug treatment was stopped the rebounding virus could be controlled. A recent experiment in monkeys infected with SIV shows that this could be effective14. Several groups are now developing effector T cell inducing vaccines against HIV using heterologous prime-boost immunisation strategies. One of the most clinically advanced programmes uses plasmid DNA prime followed by recombinant MVA boost to deliver antigens15.
Cancer: melanoma Melanoma
is one of the more immunogenic human solid tumours. It is well known that cutaneous melanomas can demonstrate partial regression of the primary tumour and that melanoma patients can develop both antibodies and CD8+ T cells against tumour antigens16. These tumour-reactive CD8+ T cells can produce tumour regression after expansion in vitro and re-injection into the same patient17. From other clinical studies, it is known that 3-15% of cutaneous melanomas are first diagnosed as lymphatic or visceral metastases with no physical evidence of a primary tumour. The ability to cure a subgroup of these patients with surgical resection suggests that immunological mechanisms are capable of managing residual micrometastatic disease18. All of these observations support the idea that melanoma tumours express antigens that can serve as targets for immunotherapy.
Central to the development of a therapeutic cancer vaccine is the molecular identification of the antigens present on the tumour cells that are recognised by the immune system. Many of the melanoma antigens that have been identified are either tissue-specific differentiation antigens (Melan-A/Mart-119, tyrosinase20, gp10021, etc) or are expressed by a diversity of tumour tissues, but are not expressed by normal tissues, other than the testis. These are the so-called ‘cancer-testis’ antigens and are encoded by genes with family names such as MAGE, BAGE, RAGE and NY-ESO-122. Antigens or CD8+ T cell epitopes from both antigen groups are currently being tested in a number of clinical trials using different antigen delivery platforms.
Most current melanoma vaccine trials use peptide CD8+ T cell epitopes mixed with adjuvants, cytokines or loaded on to dendritic cells as antigen delivery platforms. The first clinical data from peptide immunisation trials show that peptide immunisation can induce some melanoma-specific CD8+ T cell responses23-25. Oxxon Pharmaccines is currently evaluating a DNA vaccine and a recombinant MVA expressing a series of different CD8+ T cell epitopes in a heterologous primeboost regime. This antigen delivery approach offers the posibility to deliver whole antigens or even multiple antigens to ensure a broad immune responses.
Challenges and outlook
There are numerous challenges associated with the induction of an effector immune response in the presence of viral or tumour antigens, and these differ for chronic infectious diseases and cancer. In the case of chronic infectious diseases, one of the main criticisms of the concept of therapeutic vaccination is the idea that delivery of more viral antigen will not stimulate the immune system in an organism that is already confronted with large quantities of antigen. A possible answer is that despite the fact that antigen is presented by a persistent pathogen, the route of antigen presentation might be important to trigger an immune response. Combining immune modulatory interventions with drugs to lower viral load, or surgery to lower tumour burden, might help lead towards greater clinical efficacy. Many tumour antigens are weakly immunogenic and presenting them in a more immunogenic context may trigger an effective response. Finally, therapeutic vaccination might induce broader, more effective T cell specificities that are different to the specificities induced during the natural history of a disease. Delivery of antigens in a more inflammatory context might be able to overcome low immunogenicity of self/tumour antigens.
Another key issue for therapeutic vaccination will be the maintenance of sufficiently high levels of an immune response with a therapeutic effect. Treatment cycles of heterologous boost-boost regimes offer a realistic chance of maintaining high levels of effector T cells. For example priming with DNA vaccines boosted by a recombinant poxvirus (ie MVA) followed by boosting with a recombinant adenovirus. The combination of advanced antigen delivery platforms, such as heterologous prime-boost, with enhanced methods of measuring antigen-specific T cells will enable clinical researchers to correlate levels and quality of T cell responses with clinical efficacy.
Joerg Schneider, BSc, PhD, VP/Director of Research, received his PhD in 1995 in biology from the University of Mainz, Germany, for work on melanoma antigens that are recognised by the cellular immune system in man. As a Marie-Curie Research Fellow he worked in Professor Adrian Hill’s group at Oxford on the development of a vaccine against malaria. In 1999 he co-founded Oxxon Pharmaccines, an Oxford University spinout biotech company, developing therapeutic vaccines against chronic infectious diseases and cancer.
Professor Andrew McMichael is Director of the Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine at the University of Oxford and Director of the MRC Human Immunology Unit at the Institute. He trained in medicine, qualifying in 1968, and then began research at the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in 1971. After his PhD with Dr Ita Askonas, Professor McMichael worked with Professor Hugh McDevitt at Stanford University, moving to Oxford in 1977. His work has focused on the cellular immune response to virus infections and, since 1987, the pathogenesis of HIV infection and the development of an HIV vaccine. He was elected as Fellow of the Royal Society in 1992. Professor McMichael is a co-founder and Non- Executive Director of Oxxon and is currently directing Phase II clinical trials of a HIV vaccine based on Oxxon’s PrimeBoost approach.
1 Yamshchikov, G et al.Analysis of a natural immune response against tumor antigens in a melanoma survivor: lessons applicable to clinical trial evaluations. Clin Cancer Res, 2001. 7(3 Suppl): p. 909s-916s.
2 Wettendorff, M.Therapeutic vaccination.Virus Res, 2002. 82(1-2): p. 133-40.
3 Ulmer, JB et al. Generation of MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes by expression of a viral protein in muscle cells: antigen presentation by nonmuscle cells. Immunology, 1996. 89(1): p. 59-67.
4 Barouch, DH et al. Augmentation of immune responses to HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus DNA vaccines by IL-2/Ig plasmid administration in rhesus monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000. 97(8): p. 4192-7.
5 Sedegah, M et al. Improving protective immunity induced by DNA-based immunization: priming with antigen and GMCSF- encoding plasmid DNA and boosting with antigenexpressing recombinant poxvirus. J Immunol, 2000. 164(11): p. 5905-12.
6 Schneider, J et al. Induction of CD8+ T cells using heterologous prime-boost immunisation strategies. Immunol Rev, 1999. 170: p. 29- 38.
7 Estcourt, MJ et al. Primeboost immunization generates a high frequency, high-avidity CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte population. Int Immunol, 2002. 14(1): p. 31-7.
8 Hanke,T et al. Effective induction of HIV-specific CTL by multi-epitope using gene gun in a combined vaccination regime.Vaccine, 1999. 17(6): p. 589-96.
9 Degano, P et al. Gene gun intradermal DNA immunization followed by boosting with modified vaccinia virus Ankara: enhanced CD8+ T cell immunogenicity and protective efficacy in the influenza and malaria models.Vaccine, 1999. 18(7-8): p. 623-32.
10 Sullivan, NJ et al. Development of a preventive vaccine for Ebola virus infection in primates. Nature, 2000. 408(6812): p. 605-9.
11 Schneider, J et al. Enhanced immunogenicity for CD8+ T cell induction and complete protective efficacy of malaria DNA vaccination by boosting with modified vaccinia virus Ankara. Nat Med, 1998. 4(4): p. 397-402.
12 Rowland-Jones, S et al. HIVspecific cytotoxic T-cells in HIV-exposed but uninfected Gambian women. Nat Med, 1995. 1(1): p. 59-64.
13 Ogg, GS et al. Decay kinetics of human immunodeficiency virusspecific effector cytotoxic T lymphocytes after combination antiretroviral therapy. J Virol, 1999. 73(1): p. 797-800.
14 Tryniszewska, E et al. Vaccination of macaques with long-standing SIVmac251 infection lowers the viral set point after cessation of antiretroviral therapy. J Immunol, 2002. 169(9): p. 5347-57.
15 Wee, EG et al.A DNA/MVA-based candidate human immunodeficiency virus vaccine for Kenya induces multi-specific T cell responses in rhesus macaques. J Gen Virol, 2002. 83(Pt 1): p. 75-80.
16 de Vries, JE, Cornain, S and Rumke, P. Cytotoxity of non-T versus T-lymphocytes from melanoma patients and healthy donors on short- and long-term cultured melanoma cells. Int J Cancer, 1974. 14(4): p. 427-34.
17 Rosenberg, SA et al.Treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin 2. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1994. 86(15): p. 1159-66.
18 Chang,AE, Karnell, LH and Menck, HR.The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade.The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Cancer, 1998. 83(8): p. 1664-78.
19 Coulie, PG et al.A new gene coding for a differentiation antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLAA2 melanomas. J Exp Med, 1994. 180(1): p. 35-42.
20 Brichard,V et al.The tyrosinase gene codes for an antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLAA2 melanomas. J Exp Med, 1993. 178(2): p. 489-95.
21 Bakker, AB et al. Melanocyte lineage-specific antigen gp100 is recognized by melanoma-derived tumorinfiltrating lymphocytes. J Exp Med, 1994. 179(3): p. 1005-9.
22 De Smet, C et al. Genes coding for melanoma antigens recognised by cytolytic T lymphocytes. Eye, 1997. 11 ( Pt 2): p. 243-8.
23 Weber, J et al. Granulocytemacrophage- colony-stimulating factor added to a multipeptide vaccine for resected Stage II melanoma. Cancer, 2003. 97(1): p. 186-200.
24 Lee, P et al. Effects of interleukin-12 on the immune response to a multipeptide vaccine for resected metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol, 2001. 19(18): p. 3836-47.
25 Reynolds, SR et al.Vaccineinduced CD8+ T-cell responses to MAGE-3 correlate with clinical outcome in patients with melanoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2003. 9(2): p. 657-62.